Body weight targets stigmatise and potentially harm patients

Updated: Oct 21

Body weight targets that stigmatise and potentially harm patients continue to be commonly used in everyday clinical practice, but are outdated and long overdue for change, according to a presentation at this year's International Congress on Obesity, Melbourne, Australia.

Alex Craven

Dr Alex Craven, a bariatric surgeon from Austin Health in Melbourne, and colleagues draw on existing research to describe how concepts such as "ideal body weight" or "normal" body mass index (BMI) are overly simplistic and do not tell you about the health of a person.


"You could be categorized as 'normal weight' by BMI but have health problems associated with excess fat, or you could be categorized as having 'obesity' and have no health problems," explained Dr Priya Sumithran, head of obesity medicine at Austin Health, Australia. "The problem with using weight metrics alone to set treatment goals is that they put too much emphasis on a target weight and that can be misleading."


Evidence suggests that the risk of developing metabolic diseases like type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and stroke is much more complicated than just having excess weight. For instance, where fat is distributed, and the way it interacts with the body, are critically important.


At the same time, the pressure to achieve and maintain unrealistic body weight goals can have substantial psychological and social impact on individuals, and prioritizes weight-based outcomes over health. On top of this, declaring "a normal weight range" can fuel weight bias and stigma, demotivate patients and promote eating disorders such as binge eating.

"These constructs suggest there are distinct categories of underweight, ideal, overweight and obese, with sharp boundaries that hinge on a decimal place," added Craven. "As a disease, obesity has many outcomes. Increased body weight is only one outcome and it's not the most important."


The goals and perceived success of obesity treatments, (like surgery, medications and lifestyle interventions), are often linked to body weight targets based on 'ideal' or 'normal' body weight. It is important that health professionals go beyond this outdated and inaccurate approach to ensure they are making patient-centred recommendations, say the authors.


The presentation highlighted that when it comes to treating obesity, the amount of weight lost, and its impact on health outcomes, is much more important than the patient's final weight.

"Outcomes like controlling obesity-related diseases, improving physical function, and better mental health are not only important to patients," said Andrew Wilson, an advocate for people with a lived experience of obesity from the Weight Issues Network in Australia. "They are also linked to medically important outcomes like life expectancy and quality of life. Focusing on these is good for everyone."

"Body mass index is a practical screening tool that can be used in assessing people with obesity,” commented Professor Louise Baur, president of the World Obesity Federation and chair of Child & Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. “While it's simple and cheap for doctors and other health professionals to use, it must be used in conjunction with good clinical assessment that looks at whether physical and psychological health complications are present."