VITAL trial: Blunted response to vitamin D supplementation with higher BMI
Updated: Jan 23
Vitamin D may be metabolised differently in people with an elevated body mass index (BMI), according to an analysis of data from the VITAL trial, a large US clinical trial led by Brigham and Women's Hospital researchers that investigated whether taking vitamin D or marine omega-3 supplements could reduce the risk of developing cancer, heart disease or stroke. The findings were reported in the paper, ‘Association of BodyWeight With Response to Vitamin D Supplementation and Metabolism’, published in JAMA Network Open.
"The analysis of the original VITAL data found that vitamin D supplementation correlated with positive effects on several health outcomes, but only among people with a BMI under 25," said first author, Dr Deirdre K Tobias, an associate epidemiologist in Brigham's Division of Preventive Medicine. "There seems to be something different happening with vitamin D metabolism at higher body weights, and this study may help explain diminished outcomes of supplementation for individuals with an elevated BMI."
Vitamin D is an essential nutrient involved in many biological processes, most notably helping our body absorb minerals, such as calcium and magnesium. While some of the vitamin D needed is made in the body from sunlight, vitamin D deficiencies are often treated with supplementation. Evidence from laboratory studies, epidemiologic research and clinical research has also suggested that vitamin D may play a role in the incidence and progression of cancer and cardiovascular disease, and it was this evidence that prompted the original VITAL trial.
The VITAL trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 25,871 US participants, which included men over the age of 50 and women over the age of 55. All participants were free of cancer and cardiovascular disease at the time of enrolment. While the trial found little benefit of vitamin D supplementation for preventing cancer, heart attack, or stroke in the overall cohort, there was a statistical correlation between BMI and cancer incidence, cancer mortality, and autoimmune disease incidence. Other studies suggest similar results for type 2 diabetes. The new study aimed to investigate this correlation.
The researchers analysed data from 16,515 participants from the original trial who provided blood samples at baseline (before randomization to vitamin D), as well as 2,742 with a follow-up blood sample taken after two years. The researchers measured the levels of total and free vitamin D, as well as many other novel biomarkers for vitamin D, such as its metabolites, calcium, and parathyroid hormone, which helps the body utilize vitamin D.
"Most studies like this focus on the total vitamin D blood level," said senior author, Dr JoAnn E Manson, chief of the Division of Preventive Medicine at the Brigham and principal investigator of VITAL. "The fact that we were able to look at this expanded profile of vitamin D metabolites and novel biomarkers gave us unique insights into vitamin D availability and activity, and whether vitamin D metabolism might be disrupted in some people but not in others."
From the 16,515 participants (8,371 women [50.7%]; 12,420 non-Hispanic White [76.9%]) were analysed at baseline, including 2,742 with a follow-up blood sample. Before randomisation, serum total 25-OHD levels were incrementally lower at higher BMI categories (adjusted mean [SE]: underweight, 32.3 [0.7]ng/mL; normal weight, 32.3 [0.1]ng/mL; overweight, 30.5 [0.1]ng/mL; obesity class I, 29.0 [0.2]ng/mL; and obesity class II, 28.0 [0.2]ng/mL; p<0.001 for linear trend).
Similarly, baseline 25-OHD3, FVD, BioD, VDBP, albumin, and calcium levels were lower with higher BMI, while PTH level was higher (all p<.001 for linear trend). Compared with placebo, randomisation to vitamin D supplementation was associated with an increase in total 25-OHD, 25-OHD3, FVD and BioD levels compared with placebo at two years’ follow-up, but increases were significantly lower at higher BMI categories (all treatment effect interactions p<0.001). Supplementation did not substantially change VDBP, albumin, PTH, or calcium levels.
The researchers found that vitamin D supplementation increased most of the biomarkers associated with vitamin D metabolism in people, regardless of their weight. However, these increases were significantly smaller in people with elevated BMIs.
"We observed striking differences after two years, indicating a blunted response to vitamin D supplementation with higher BMI," Tobias said. "This may have implications clinically and potentially explain some of the observed differences in the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation by obesity status."
"This study sheds light on why we're seeing 30–40% reductions in cancer deaths, autoimmune diseases, and other outcomes with vitamin D supplementation among those with lower BMIs but minimal benefit in those with higher BMIs, suggesting it may be possible to achieve benefits across the population with more personalized dosing of vitamin D," said Manson. "These nuances make it clear that there's more to the vitamin D story."
The authors concluded that the VITAL findings are a call to action for the research community to continue exploring the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation for preventing cancer and other diseases, and to take BMI into account when evaluating the supplement's health impacts.
To access this article, please click here